Atlas / Compare

Veo 3.1 vs Kling 2.5 Turbo Pro

Kling 2.5 Turbo Pro is cheaper at the tracked configurations. The better choice depends on latency, audio, resolution and workflow fit.

MetricVeo 3.1Kling 2.5 Turbo Pro
ProviderGoogle via RunwayKling via fal
Price / second$0.40$0.07
10-second clip$4.00$0.70
Tracked resolution1080p1080p
Native audioYesNo
Best forPremium audiovisual output and cinematic promptsQuality-conscious generation at a midrange price

Which should you choose?

Pick Veo 3.1 for premium audiovisual output and cinematic prompts. Pick Kling 2.5 Turbo Pro for quality-conscious generation at a midrange price. Use the same prompt brief, aspect ratio and acceptance rubric across both.

Cost at production volume

At 1,000 ten-second generations, Veo 3.1 is about $4000 and Kling 2.5 Turbo Pro is about $700, before retries and ancillary fees.

Method

We prioritize first-party API pricing and explicitly label resolution and audio. Speed descriptions are directional unless the provider publishes a repeatable benchmark.