Atlas / Compare

Veo 3.1 vs Seedance 2.0

Seedance 2.0 is cheaper at the tracked configurations. The better choice depends on latency, audio, resolution and workflow fit.

MetricVeo 3.1Seedance 2.0
ProviderGoogle via RunwayByteDance via fal
Price / second$0.40$0.30
10-second clip$4.00$3.03
Tracked resolution1080p720p
Native audioYesYes
Best forPremium audiovisual output and cinematic promptsComplex prompts, references and multi-shot output

Which should you choose?

Pick Veo 3.1 for premium audiovisual output and cinematic prompts. Pick Seedance 2.0 for complex prompts, references and multi-shot output. Use the same prompt brief, aspect ratio and acceptance rubric across both.

Cost at production volume

At 1,000 ten-second generations, Veo 3.1 is about $4000 and Seedance 2.0 is about $3034, before retries and ancillary fees.

Method

We prioritize first-party API pricing and explicitly label resolution and audio. Speed descriptions are directional unless the provider publishes a repeatable benchmark.