Atlas / Compare

Wan 3 · 480p vs Kling 2.5 Turbo Pro

Wan 3 · 480p is cheaper at the tracked configurations. The better choice depends on latency, audio, resolution and workflow fit.

MetricWan 3 · 480pKling 2.5 Turbo Pro
ProviderRunway APIKling via fal
Price / second$0.05$0.07
10-second clip$0.50$0.70
Tracked resolution480p1080p
Native audioNoNo
Best forCheap iteration and motion previsualizationQuality-conscious generation at a midrange price

Which should you choose?

Pick Wan 3 · 480p for cheap iteration and motion previsualization. Pick Kling 2.5 Turbo Pro for quality-conscious generation at a midrange price. Use the same prompt brief, aspect ratio and acceptance rubric across both.

Cost at production volume

At 1,000 ten-second generations, Wan 3 · 480p is about $500 and Kling 2.5 Turbo Pro is about $700, before retries and ancillary fees.

Method

We prioritize first-party API pricing and explicitly label resolution and audio. Speed descriptions are directional unless the provider publishes a repeatable benchmark.